The cognitivo error is tied with the formal learning, to already established, that it depends on knowledge so that does not happen. The person is evaluated for what already she learned. She has a daily pay-determination in the judgment. I take the blame myself or am guilty for not having used the knowledge of adequate form. Already the existential error is tied with a picture of choices.
The person makes the choice, however later only is that it will verify it made if it correctly or not. It does not have a daily pay-determination in the judgment. The guilt feeling, in this situation, occurs later to the choice, after its experience. It agrees to understand that, at the moment where the choice was made, it was, who knows, the best option; however, with passing of the time, it was verified that it was not well thus. Why blaming in them in such a way for something whose resulted not yet we knew? In the reality, the guilt that we feel does not come properly of the error in itself, but in the way as we react when we make inadequate choices. We must be less rigid, in our auto-evaluation. At last! The existential autogerenciamento, when displaying its vision of error, beyond having as objective teaching in them to deal with our errors of different form, each one in its context; it also teaches to us not in such a way disturbing in them with them. The form that you introjeta the guilt are determinative in the way to interact with it.
The autopunio is directly on to this agreement. According to existential autogerenciamento the systematic autopunio and the medicalizao of the suffering finish unchaining adoecimento process. Why we blame in them unnecessary? It will be that we are we forget that still we are human! If it does not forget! Yesterday already he was future, already it was present and today it is passed.